Legal Opinion
Ruzic v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 8, 1990No. C8-89-2087PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHORT, Judge.
Joseph John Ruzic appeals from the trial court’s order sustaining the revocation of his driver’s license under the implied consent law, Minn.Stat. § 169.123, subd. 4 (1988). Appellant argues (1) the trial court erred in holding a bulldozer, which appellant was driving on private property, was a “motor vehicle” within the meaning of Minn.Stat. § 169.123, and (2) revocation of appellant’s driver’s license violated his constitutional rights. We disagree and affirm.
FACTS
On June 9, 1989, at approximately 9:30 p.m., an Eden Prairie police officer was dispatched to investigate a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re HaggertySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- McGuire v. C & L RESTAURANT INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. NewstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Price v. AmdalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- State on Behalf of Forslund v. BronsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brooks v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- In Re the Civil Commitment of RameyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Hard Times Cafe, Inc. v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Thul v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Zeman v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.