Legal Opinion
Brooks v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 22, 1998No. C3-98-111, C5-98-112, C7-98-113, C5-98-269, C1-98-270, C3-98-271PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARVEY A. HOLTAN, Judge. *
The drivers appeal from trial court orders sustaining the revocation of their drivers’ licenses. They challenge on statutory and constitutional grounds the lawfulness of the use of Intoxilyzer test samples that allegedly exceeded the minimum adequate sample. We affirm.
FACTS
The facts are undisputed. After being arrested for DWI offenses, each of the appellants took an Intoxilyzer test pursuant to the implied consent law. The Intoxilyzer indicates that the driver has provided an adequate sample by showing a zero to the left of the decimal point of the display of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In re P.T.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Genung v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- In re the Rental Dwelling License held by KhanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- Eason v. Independent School District No. 11Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Hartung v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.