Legal Opinion

State on Behalf of Forslund v. Bronson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 16, 1981No. 50789PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMDAHL, Justice.

Defendant, Richard Bronson, appeals from an order of the district court granting plaintiff’s Motion to Establish an Order of Support and directing defendant to make payments for the support of his minor child. 1 On August 26, 1974, when defendant and plaintiff were each 16 years of age, a child was bom to plaintiff. An action to determine paternity was commenced and, upon stipulation, defendant was, on December 18, 1975, adjudged the father of the child. In its Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order for Judgment, the court included as a conclusion of law:

3. That the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Orr v. OrrSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Caban v. MohammedSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Stanton v. StantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. State v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Matter of SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. Matter of HarhutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  5. State v. OrselloSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API