Legal Opinion

State v. Newstrom

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 19, 1985No. CO-83-1325PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAHL, Justice.

In 1981, Jeanne Newstrom and her husband removed their two children from afternoon classes at public school and began teaching them at home during those hours. Jeanne Newstrom was subsequently charged and convicted, after a jury trial, of violating Minnesota’s compulsory school attendance law. Minn.Stat. § 120.12, subd. 3 (1984). A three-judge district court panel affirmed the conviction. We reverse.

Jeanne Newstrom is the mother of two school-age children, Katie and Dawn, both under 9 years of age at the time of the original criminal charge. She and her husband live with their…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. State v. KrawskySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Dunham v. RoerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  4. Blackwelder v. SafnauerDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1988
  5. State v. PatzerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API