Legal Opinion

Price v. Amdal

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 10, 1977No. 46704PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MacLAUGHLIN, Justice.

This is an appeal by the trustee for the heirs of the deceased driver of an automobile from an order of the district court denying consolidation of three cases arising from a two-car collision.1 The surviving driver had argued that the cases be tried separately and in the sequence in which they had been filed unless the trustee would agree to waive her right to the mandatory jury instruction concerning the presumption of the decedent’s exercise of due care pursuant to Minn.St. 602.04.2

*463The three cases arose from the following undisputed facts. On March 6, 1973, a car owned…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Ryan v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  3. Schwartz v. TalmoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  4. Aubin v. Duluth Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  5. Travelers Insurance Company v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Florenzano v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. State v. NordstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Wegan v. Village of LexingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. Olson v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  5. Matter of HarhutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API