Legal Opinion
Zeman v. City of Minneapolis
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 25, 1996No. CX-95-429PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILLIS, Judge.
On appeal from a summary judgment, Robert Zeman argues that the city’s erroneous revocation of his rental license effected a taking of his property. Zeman also appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment on his constitutional claims and the court’s issuance of a protective order. We affirm the summary judgment on Zeman’s vagueness claim, procedural due process claim, and equal protection claim. We reverse the summary judgment on Zeman’s inverse condemnation claim and remand for re-examination of the protective order ruling.
FACTS
Appellant Robert Zeman owns a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Fischer v. St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Condor Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation v. City of St. Paul, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Zeman v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996