People v. Pereles
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
1Opinion of the CourtMcLUCAS, P. J.
The defendant was charged in two counts with violations of section 13 of the State Pharmacy Act (Stats. 1905, p. 535; Act 5886, Deering’s General Laws, 1923),- and was adjudged guilty on both counts. In count I it was charged that the defendant “did willfully and unlawfully sell, retail and dispense drugs, medicines and poisons, to-wit: Lysol, the said Abe Percies not being then and there a registered pharmacist licensed to practice in the state of California, nor under the direct, immediate and personal supervision of a registered pharmacist licensed to practice in the State of California”.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- In Re HainesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Buckstaff v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Ex parte HedleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- In Re WasherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Marshall v. HancockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. McGeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- In Re Wilson's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1936
- Frederick H. Jackson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- Bickford v. LawsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Leach v. DinsmoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.