Legal Opinion

In Re Wilson's Estate

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1936No. 7,497PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The position of appellant is that in arriving at the clear market value of the estate in question for inheritance tax purposes, the family allowance should not have been deducted from the gross value thereof. In support of that position we shall place before the court so much of the laws relating to a tax on inheritances and transfers as we consider pertinent and base such argument thereon as our capacity affords. [Here follows a historical review of legislation referring to inheritance taxes.] The allowance to respondent, Martha Wilson, was made upon the authority of section 10146, Revised…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Hellmich v. HellmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Bowers v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  3. Dosen v. East Butte Copper Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Cruse v. FischlMontana Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Kennedy v. McDougalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. State Board of Equalization v. ColeMontana Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Swanson v. Hartford Ins. Co. of MidwestMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. HaworthIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Gaustad ex rel. M.G. v. City of ColumbusMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State Ex Rel. Great Falls Housing Authority v. City of Great FallsMontana Supreme Court · 1940

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API