Legal Opinion

City of Idanha v. Consumers Power, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 14, 1973PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

Defendant, by this, appeal, challenges the validity of a decree on mandate entered by the trial court following our decision on the merits on a previous appeal in this case. City of Idanha v. Consumers Power, 8 Or App 551, 495 P2d 294 (1972). So far as material to an understanding of the issues which defendant seeks to raise on this appeal, the thrust of our decision in Idanha was that while plaintiff city had legal authority to enact the ordinance (No. 6) imposing license fees on public utilities operating within the city, plaintiff could not by such ordinance forbid defendant, a nonprofit…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. MacKall v. RichardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. William Hanley Co. v. CombsOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  3. City of Idanha v. Consumers Power, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1972

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Koch v. Southern Pacific Transportation CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Pamplin v. VictoriaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. Baker v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  4. Buckner v. Kennedy's Riding AcademyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  5. Carey v. WallnerMontana Supreme Court · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API