Legal Opinion

State v. Guzman-Vera

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 1, 2020No. A166866PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

161 Argued and submitted July 9, 2019; portion of judgment requiring defendant to pay attorney fees reversed, otherwise affirmed July 1; petition for review denied October 1, 2020 ( 367 Or 115) STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JUAN ANTONIO GUZMAN-VERA, Defendant-Appellant. Washington County Circuit Court 17CN06363; A166866

469 P3d 842

Defendant appeals a judgment of punitive contempt for violating a restrain- ing order issued under the Family Abuse Prevention Act (FAPA). In his first assignment of error, he contends that the trial court applied the wrong legal standard in finding him…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pereida-Alba v. CourseyOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State Ex Rel. Mikkelsen v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. Department of Revenue v. Carpet Warehouse, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Pamplin v. VictoriaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. White v. ReyesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  2. State v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  3. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  4. State v. CervantesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  5. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API