Legal Opinion

Qui Phu Phan v. Morrow

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 8, 2003No. 98C-17162; A112599PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

Petitioner appeals from a judgment dismissing his post-conviction petition with prejudice and denying post-conviction relief. The trial court dismissed the post-conviction petition with prejudice because petitioner’s trial counsel had failed to timely file a trial memorandum. We reverse the judgment and remand to the trial court.

Petitioner pleaded no contest to aggravated murder in June 1998. He received a 30-year sentence with eligibility for parole after 25 years. Petitioner did not appeal the judgment or sentence. In his post-conviction petition, petitioner alleged that he received…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pamplin v. VictoriaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. Hahm v. HillsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. Phan Le Dinh v. ZenonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Peeples v. LampertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. Zimmerman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. Laack v. BotelloCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  4. Markstrom v. Guard Publ'g Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  5. Markstrom v. Guard Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API