Legal Opinion

Hahm v. Hills

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 10, 1984No. A-8107-04433; CA A26507PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

This is a securities case in which plaintiffs alleged that defendant Hills and others violated state and federal securities laws. They sought $569,000 in damages plus more than $200,000 in attorney fees, expenses and costs. Defendant Hills appeals from a judgment for plaintiffs. The dispositive issue is whether the trial court abused its discretion in striking defendant’s appearance, in declaring him in default and in entering judgment for plaintiffs. We conclude that it did.

Plaintiffs’ complaint alleges that they had invested in securities relating to the purchase of various real properties,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Karsun v. KelleyOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Garrison v. CookOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Santiam Fish & Game Ass'n v. State Tax CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Tipton v. ARCO Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Chang v. ChunCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  3. Pamplin v. VictoriaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. Qui Phu Phan v. MorrowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. Boline v. WhiteheadCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API