Rudneck v. Southern California Metal & Rubber Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtOlney, J.
This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment against it for the purchase price of certain materials found to have been delivered to it under a contract of purchase from the plaintiffs and for which it failed to pay. That a contract was made, that certain materials were delivered under it, and that the defendant refused to pay therefor are admitted. The substantial defense was that the materials delivered were not of the character called for by the contract. The facts are:
The plaintiffs are engaged in the junk business in Kern County, and were the owners of a pile of machine-shop refuse…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- California Savings & Loan Society v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Alaska Salmon Co. v. Standard Box Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- First Natl. Bank of San Luis Obispo v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Ward Land & Stock Co. v. MapesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Holden v. MensingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Tyrone v. KelleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Edwards v. Container Kraft Carton & Paper Supply Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958
- Hall v. Citizens National Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Goodman v. Anglo-California Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1923
- San Francisco Foundation v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.