Legal Opinion
St. Louis-S. F. R. Co. v. City of Tulsa
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 29, 1935No. 22978PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
The plaintiff brings this action for injunction against the enforcement of an assessment for paving on a portion of Admiral boulevard in the city of Tulsa. The railroad right of way through the improvement district was never platted. Admiral boulevard at the west end of the paving lies 78.7 feet south and at the east end 148.7 feet south of the right of way. The right of way is 200 feet wide. The next open parallel street to ¿he north is Archer street. At the west end Archer street is 300 feet north and at the east end 200 feet north of the right of way.
The controlling provision of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- French v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Houck v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Gast Realty & Investment Co. v. Schneider Granite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Martin v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Public Service Co. of Oklahoma v. Northwest Rogers County Fire Protection DistrictSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Kansas City Southern Railroad v. City of DeridderLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
- City of Muskogee v. BorumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962