Legal Opinion · Dissent

Barnes v. Weyerhaeuser Company

North Carolina Industrial Commission

Decided November 26, 2002No. I.C. NO. 835055Published

1Dissent

While plaintiff has contracted the occupational disease of asbestosis, I must respectfully dissent from the majority decision to order removal and pay 104 weeks of benefits pursuant to N.C. GEN. STAT § 97-61.5(b). Contrary to the express language of the statute, the majority finds that an order of removal and the award of 104 weeks of benefits are warranted based solely on one fact alone: that plaintiff has asbestosis. This, however, is not the law.

NECESSARY ELEMENTS FOR ORDER OF REMOVAL/104 WEEKS

Removal from employment under § 97-61.5, requires a finding of at least two conditions: (1) that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Barber v. Babcock & Wilcox Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Young v. . Whitehall Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. Honeycutt v. Carolina Asbestos Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Roberts v. Southeastern Magnesia & Asbestos Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  5. Austin v. Continental General TireCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API