Legal Opinion

Austin v. Continental General Tire

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 29, 2000No. COA99-693PublishedCited by 96 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGEE, Judge.

Pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-86 (1999), defendant-employer Continental General Tire (defendant) appeals an opinion and award of the North Carolina Industrial Commission (the Commission) entered 18 December 1998. For the reasons stated herein, we affirm.

Plaintiff Wayne Austin (plaintiff) was employed by defendant for over twenty years, during which time the record shows he was repeatedly exposed to asbestos dust and fibers. On 9 November 1986, the union to which plaintiff belonged caused an Examobile to come to the plant and have employees screened for asbestos-related dis*400eases…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Adams v. AVX Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Meyer v. WallsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  3. State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Rate BureauSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Electric Supply Co. of Durham, Inc. v. Swain Electrical Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  5. Young v. . Whitehall Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by96 opinions

  1. Abernathy v. Sandoz Chemicals/Clariant Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Clark v. Sanger Clinic, P.A.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. Payne v. Charlotte Heating & Air ConditioningCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. Vaughn v. INSULATING SERVICESCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  5. Lesner Pointe Condominium Ass'n v. Harbour Point Building Corp.Virginia Circuit Court · 2002

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API