Legal Opinion

Honeycutt v. Carolina Asbestos Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 30, 1952No. 523PublishedCited by 118 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDbNNy, J.

The principal question involved in this appeal is whether an employee who is disabled and incapacitated as the result of asbestosis from performing normal labor in the last occupation in which remunera-tively employed is entitled to compensation for total disability under the provisions of our Workmen’s Compensation Act.

The appellants take the position that the plaintiff is not totally disabled within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, since he is earning more wages as a policeman than he earned as an asbestos worker. They are relying on the case of Branham v. Panel Company, 223…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Young v. . Whitehall Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. Branham v. Denny Roll & Panel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. Wisconsin Granite Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Dail v. Kellex Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Smith v. . Swift Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by118 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Southeastern Magnesia & Asbestos Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Fetner v. Rocky Mount Marble & Granite WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. Davis v. NC Granite CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Jones v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  5. Purvis ex rel. Liles v. Faulkner Neon & Electric Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API