Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Southeastern Magnesia & Asbestos Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 19, 1983No. 8210IC333PublishedCited by 107 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

Defendants first challenge the Industrial Commission’s findings of fact that plaintiffs exposure to asbestos after 20 September 1976 augmented his disease and that plaintiffs last injurious exposure to asbestos was between 20 September 1976 and 17 July 1978. If the Commission’s findings of fact are supported by competent evidence they may not be disturbed on appeal. Hollman v. City of Raleigh, 273 N.C. 240, 159 S.E. 2d 874 (1968); 8 N.C. Index 3d, Master and Servant § 96. Since these findings of fact were supported by competent evidence presented at the hearing, we find…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Young v. . Whitehall Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. Honeycutt v. Carolina Asbestos Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Hollman v. City of Raleigh, Public Utilities DepartmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Davis v. NC Granite CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Pitman v. L. M. Carpenter & AssociatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

3Cited by107 opinions

  1. Clark v. ITT Grinnell Industrial Piping, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Austin v. Continental General TireCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  3. Moore v. Standard Mineral Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  4. Hicks v. Leviton Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  5. Davis v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API