Legal Opinion

Kinross Copper Corp. v. State of Oregon

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 13, 1999No. 960906900; CA A98316PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Plaintiff Kinross Copper Corporation petitions for reconsideration of our opinion affirming the trial court’s entry of summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs state and federal takings claims based on the denial of a permit to discharge mining wastewater into a river of the state. Kinross Copper Corp. v. State of Oregon, 160 Or App 513, 981 P2d 833 (1999). Plaintiff contends that, in our opinion, we erred in construing or applying the law. ORAP 6.25(1)(e). We allow the petition, but adhere to our opinion for the reasons that follow.

Plaintiff alleged that it suffered an uncompensated taking of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kinross Copper Corp. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. Harbison v. City of HillsboroOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Bergman v. HoldenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. Garbarino v. VAN CLEAVEOregon Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Frady v. MorrowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. Shuler v. Distribution Trucking Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. Pratt v. ArmenakisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. Deupree v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. State v. Dominguez-CoronadoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API