Legal Opinion

Frady v. Morrow

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 2, 2000No. 98C-16765; CA A103375PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.

Plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s sua sponte dismissal of his habeas corpus petition in which he alleged that the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (Board) unlawfully deferred his release date. We reverse and remand.

Plaintiff was sentenced to life in prison for a murder he committed in June 1977. The Board set a parole release date of December 4,1996, but later deferred parole by order, stating:

“The Board has received a psychological evaluation on inmate dated 03/25/1998.
“The Board, based on all the information it is considering at this hearing finds that the doctor’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Weidner v. ArmenakisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. Merrill v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. McClintock v. SchiedlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. Kinross Copper Corp. v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Griffin v. Unocal Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  2. Cline v. Ashland, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  3. Brock v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. Blackledge v. MorrowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. Foust v. American Standard InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API