Kinross Copper Corp. v. State
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.
In this inverse condemnation case, plaintiff Kinross Copper Corporation seeks compensation for the value of its unpatented mining claims, which it contends has been reduced to zero as a result of the state’s denial of a permit to discharge wastewater that would result from plaintiff’s proposed mining operations. Plaintiff alleged a right to compensation under the takings clauses of both the federal and state constitutions. The trial court entered summary judgment in favor of the state on both claims. We affirm.
The parties stipulated to the relevant facts. In 1975, Amoco Minerals Company…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- State v. HitzOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- California Oregon Power Co. v. Beaver Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Atchison v. PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Seven Up Pete Venture v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2005
- Hydro Resources Corp. v. GrayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
- Frady v. MorrowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Kinross Copper Corp. v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Shuler v. Distribution Trucking Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.