Legal Opinion

Bergman v. Holden

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 4, 1993No. 87-2115; CA A72538PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

Plaintiff petitions the Supreme Court for review of our decision reversing the trial court, which had entered judgment in plaintiffs favor. 118 Or App 530, 848 P2d 141 (1993). We treat the petition as one for reconsideration, allow it, modify our opinion and adhere to it as modified.

Plaintiff argues that we erred in concluding that defendant could not be found liable under Restatement (Second) Torts sections 876(a) and (b), 1 as the trial court found, because

“there is no direct evidence that defendant knew anything about the conduct of the other defendants. There is no evidence that he knew…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Illingworth v. BushongOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Kentner v. Gulf InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Bergman v. HoldenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kinross Copper Corp. v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. Rosboro Lumber Co. v. ApselCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. Simington Gardens, LLC v. Rock Ridge Farms, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  4. Snow Mountain Pine, Ltd. v. Tecton Laminates Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. Snow Mountain Pine, Ltd. v. Tecton Laminates Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API