Legal Opinion

Deupree v. State

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 25, 2001No. 99-3085-E-2; CA A109725PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a summary judgment and judgment on the pleadings in favor of defendants, who are the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) and four ODOT employees. Plaintiffs contend that the trial court erred in dismissing their claims for inverse condemnation and violation of 42 USC § 1983 on the ground that the claims were not ripe and in dismissing their claim under ORS 105.755(2) for damages for loss of access to their property resulting from ODOT changing the grade of an abutting public highway. We affirm.

The material facts, for purposes of defendants’ motions, are…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Homebuilders Ass'n v. Tualatin Hills Park & Recreation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  2. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Alderwoods (Oregon), Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Coast Range Conifers, LLC v. State Ex Rel. Oregon State Board of ForestryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. Deupree v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  5. Archer v. WarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API