Legal Opinion

Midland-Ross Corp. v. United Steelworkers of America

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 21, 1979No. Civ. A. No. 78-739PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SNYDER, District Judge.

In this action under Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, 29 U.S.C. § 185, the Defendant-Union seeks to compel discovery of the salaries of various individual employees of the Plaintiff. The Motion will be partially granted.

The dispute in this case arises out of an alleged four-day work stoppage at Plaintiff’s Sharon, Pennsylvania facility, in derogation of a no-strike provision in the parties’ collective bargaining agreement. Plaintiff claims damages for salary costs of $10,439.00 per day, attributable to payments to 138 foremen,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers of America v. Oliver CorpCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
  3. Milner v. National School of Health TechnologyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Hubbard v. Rubbermaid, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1978
  5. United States of America and William W. Ankrom, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service v. John A. Howard, President, Langley-Howard, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rolscreen Co. v. Pella Products of St. Louis, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1992
  2. AM International, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1981
  3. Briney v. Deere & Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1993
  4. Gateway Coal Co. v. International Union, United Mine Workers of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API