Legal Opinion
Rolscreen Co. v. Pella Products of St. Louis, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Iowa
Decided November 23, 1992No. 4-91-CV-70766PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
BENNETT, United States Magistrate Judge.
This case raises the troublesome question of whether and under what circumstances a protective order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) should be issued to prohibit the deposition of the president of a corporation who is a party to this litigation. Plaintiff Rolscreen Corporation (“Rolscreen”) seeks to prohibit Defendant Pella Products of St. Louis, Inc. (“Pella Products-St. Louis”) from taking the deposition of Rolscreen’s president, Wayne Bevis.
I. INTRODUCTION AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND.
On October…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Gulf Oil Co. v. BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Sarah Helen Williams Dollar v. Long Mfg., N. C., Inc., and Third-Party v. Nichols Tractor Company, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Alexander v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- Sender v. MannDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2004
- Poitra v. School District No. 1District Court, D. Colorado · 2015
- United States v. Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Lohrenz v. DonnellyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.