Legal Opinion

Gateway Coal Co. v. International Union, United Mine Workers of America

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 15, 1994No. Civ. A. No. 89-2430Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

D. BROOKS SMITH, District Judge.

I. Introduction

Plaintiff Gateway Coal Company (“Gateway”) brought this action pursuant to Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185, for damages allegedly sustained as a result of the defendants’ (collectively, “the Unions”) participation in, or authorization of, work stoppages in violation of a collective bargaining agreement at Gateway coal mines during the 1989 United Mine Workers of America (“UMWA”) strike against the Pittston Coal Company. This matter is currently before the Court on defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Carbon Fuel Co. v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API