Citywide Coalition for Utility Reform v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
CCUR argues that a non-cost-based declining block rate structure does not promote energy conservation and must be eliminated under the *533Public Utilities Regulatory Policies Act of 1978, Section 2601 et seq., Title 16, U.S.Code (“PURPA”) and R.C. 4905.70.3
CCUR’s reliance on the declining block standard proposed by PURPA is clearly misplaced. The commission is not required to adopt or implement that standard (Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm. v. Mississippi [1982], 456 U.S. 742, 749-750, 102 S.Ct. 2126, 2132, 72 L.Ed.2d 532, 540-541; Greater Cleveland Welfare Rights Org., Inc. v. Pub. Util. Comm.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- General Motors Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- City of Cleveland v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Greater Cleveland Welfare Rights Organization, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re Application of Ohio Power Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014