In re Complaint of Harris Design Servs. v. Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc. (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDeWine, J.
*140 {¶ 1} A public-utility company claims that it gave its customer adequate notice *860 that natural-gas service to the customer's property had been disconnected by hanging two notices on the front door of the property. The customer, who was not occupying the property, did not discover the notices and thus did not realize that the gas had been disconnected until the pipes froze and burst, causing damage. Whether the utility company furnished adequate notice of the service disconnection is the main question in this appeal from orders of the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio ("PUCO"). We conclude…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Constellation NewEnergy, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Monongahela Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Discount Cellular, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- In re Application of Am. Transm. Sys., Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010
- In re Complaints of Lycourt-Donovan v. Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re Application of Duke Energy Ohio, Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
- Goree v. Northland Auto Ents. Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
- In re Application of Ohio Power Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- Boler-Bey v. Warden Marion Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019
- In re OVEC Generational Purchase Rider Audits Required by R.C. 4928.148Ohio Supreme Court · 2026