State v. Parento
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtHudson, J.
The respondent, indicted with one John Walker for conspiracy (Walker has not been tried), appeals from the ruling of the presiding Justice refusing to set aside the jury’s verdict of guilty. It is not necessary to recite the lengthy indictment. The County Attorney states its gist, saying: (they) “conspired and agreed together . . . that they would represent to Chasse and Ward that they had connections with the Judge of the Federal Court in Bangor through an attorney at law who practiced law in Bangor and who was a nephew of the Judge and that they could ‘fix’ Chasse’s and Ward’s cases for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BeneschMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Rosenblum v. RosenblumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- People v. LongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Commonwealth v. BardoplhSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- State v. RichardsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. PoolerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1945
- State v. PeabodySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
- State v. PapalosSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1955
- State v. RisioSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- State v. VoisineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978