Rosenblum v. Rosenblum

Opinion by

Me. Justice Linn,

Plaintiff sued 1 for damages resulting from alleged conspiracy. He contended that defendants conspired and executed their conspiracy unlawfully to injure him by reducing his income and impairing his credit and capacity to do business. The verdict and judgment were against two of the defendants, H. David Eosenblum and Samuel W. Epstein, now the appellants.

Conspiracy may be proved by direct or by circumstantial evidence. As there was no direct evidence of the agreement, the circumstances were relied on. In such case, before circumstantial evidence may be submitted to…