People v. Long
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. P. EL Thompson, Clarence Meily, and Goldberg & Meily, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtTaggart, J.
Appellant was informed against jointly with two other defendants upon a charge of robbery. He was given a separate trial and convicted, and on May 8, 1905, the day set for pronouncing judgment, placed on a conditional probation for the term of two years. Imposition of sentence was suspended, as provided by subdivision 1 of section 1203 of the Penal Code, in accordance with the terms of the order admitting him to probation. On August 25, 1906, he was accused of violating his parole, brought before the court, and, after a hearing, adjudged to have violated the conditions of his probation and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- People v. DoleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- People v. AmayaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- People v. LawrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- People v. Ah SamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- People v. TesharaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- People v. StecconeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- People v. Wong LoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- People v. AdayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Davis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- People v. ReingoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.