Legal Opinion
State v. Pooler
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided July 21, 1945PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtManser, J.
There are three respondents who were indicted jointly with other persons for conspiracy to engage in maintaining and operating lotteries. Thirteen cases were *276argued together as they present essentially the same issues of law.
The respondent, Pooler alias Poulin, was indicted in seven cases with another person in each case, but not with either of the two other respondents whose cases are before the Court. The indictments in these cases related to lotteries designated as “Old Reliable.”
The respondent, Caron, was indicted in six cases with one other person in each case. In four of these the other…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Callan v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Clune v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Douglas v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Phalen v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. LaPlumeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
- State v. BurnettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- State v. GoldmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
- State v. ChickSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
- Berger v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.