State v. Peabody
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
ARCHIBALD, Justice.
The defendant has appealed from his conviction after having been indicted, tried before a jury and found guilty of second degree arson. 17 M.R.S.A. § 162. 1 The appeal is premised upon three allegedly erroneous rulings by the Justice who presided at the trial. Appellant asserts that the Justice erred in these respects:(1) He refused to grant motions for a mistrial because, after permitting the jury to hear an oral statement made to the owner of the burned structure, he then ruled that the statement should be excluded for failure to give the so-called Miranda warning.(2) He…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. CollinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
- State v. FletcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. LaffertySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
- Truex v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. WallaceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
- State v. MyersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
- Eben v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. IzzoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
- State v. GagnonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.