Legal Opinion

State v. Voisine

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided September 29, 1978PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GODFREY, Justice.

Appellant Voisine was indicted for conspiracy to commit the crime of cheating by false pretenses in violation of the former 17 M.R.S.A. § 951 (1964) and for cheating by false pretenses in violation of the former 17 M.R.S.A. § 1601 (1964). A jury found appellant guilty on both counts, and he appeals, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence.

The facts developed in the trial showed that the timekeeper for the Portland Department of Public Works, Roderick Morgan, had caused certain employees to be overpaid. Morgan testified he had made a practice of falsely attributing extra…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. ParentoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1938
  2. State v. ChamberlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. CloughSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API