Legal Opinion

Dillon v. Dillon

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1943PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

The principal contention of appellant, Thomas J. Dillon, is that his interests in the income and corpus of a testamentary trust created by Charlotte M. Burgess, his grandmother (hereinafter called the “Burgess trust”), is not assignable and cannot be reached for the payment to plaintiff of alimony or the support of his children; and that therefore the court erred in adjudging as follows: (1) That there is awarded to plaintiff fifty per cent of appellant’s income from the Burgess trust as alimony, — pending the final determination of the property rights of the parties, — and twenty-five per…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moorehead's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Stewart's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Sloane v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Gray v. GrayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Coy v. HumphreysMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. CaldwellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Van Dyke v. First National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  3. Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
  4. In Re Trust Created by MoultonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  5. Trowbridge v. TrowbridgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API