Legal Opinion

Gray v. Gray

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1942PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

One of the questions raised arises from the fact that in the judgment of divorce the court both provided for a final division of estate between the parties and granted the wife alimony. For many years the law in this state was that when the provision made in a judgment of divorce for the wife was a division of property, such provision excluded the possibility of any allowance to her for alimony, and that any provision for alimony in addition to the final distribution of estate should be treated, as a nullity. Wacker v. Wacker (1929), 199 Wis. 197, 225 N. W. 749; Trush v. Trush (1931), 204…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hannon v. HannonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Wacker v. WackerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Riedel v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Trush v. TrushWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wright v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1974
  2. Trowbridge v. TrowbridgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Anderson v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Dillon v. DillonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Johnson v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API