Legal Opinion

Trowbridge v. Trowbridge

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1962PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

1. Alimony freeze. With respect to the alimony awarded, the judgment contained a provision that the monthly payment shall be constant and neither party “shall be allowed, for any reason whatsoever, to come into this court to either raise or reduce said sum of Two Hundred and Fifty ($250) Dollars per month.”

Sec. 247.32, Stats., provides:

“After a judgment providing for alimony . . . the court may, from time to time, on the petition of either of the parties and upon notice to the family court commissioner, revise and alter such judgment respecting the amount of such alimony or allowance and the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Campbell v. CampbellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Lally v. LallyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Anderson v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Knutson v. KnutsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Schafer v. SchaferWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Van Oosting v. Van OostingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Davidson v. DavidsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  3. Lacey v. LaceyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Di Tolvo v. Di TolvoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  5. In Re the Marriage of BalansonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API