Legal Opinion
Van Dyke v. First National Bank
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 2, 1951No. 35,269PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Knutson, Justice.
The facts in this case are not in dispute. On June 1, 1922, E. H. Moulton created an inter vivos trust under which he directed payment of income to be made to his daughter, Katherine S. van Dyke, and his two grandchildren, Henry S. van Dyke and Katherine van Dyke, as long as they shall live, with the remainder to designated beneficiaries, in these words:
*288“The Trustee shall pay the net income therefrom in equal shares to Katherine S. Yan Dyke and her two children, Henry S. Van Dyke and Katherine Van Dyke, as long as they shall live, the shares of said Henry S. Van Dyke and…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Moorehead's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Dumaine v. DumaineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Becker v. ChesterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
- Morgan'S EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- In Re Trust Under Will of HoldenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Johnson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- In Re WernerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1983
- In Re Trust Created by MoultonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- In Matter of Campbell's TrustsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Wayne Drewes, Trustee-Appellant v. Barry Schonteich, Debtor, Linda Schonteich, Debtor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.