Legal Opinion

Quackenbush v. Armato, Gaims, Weil, West & Epstein

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 30, 1995No. G014366PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WALLIN, J.

The Insurance Commissioner of the State of California (the Insurance Commissioner) was appointed as the conservator and liquidator of Title U.S.A. Insurance Corporation (Title U.S.A.) in a proceeding brought under section 1010 et seq. of the Insurance Code.1 The Insurance Commissioner filed suit against the law firm of Armato, Gaims, Weil, West & Epstein (Armato) to recover from it money it obtained pursuant to a judgment against Title U.S.A. for unpaid legal fees. The trial court concluded the Orange County Superior Court commissioner who appointed the Insurance Commissioner…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hurtado v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Brown v. MerloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Bernhard v. Harrah's ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Carpenter v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Offshore Rental Co. v. Continental Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Title USA Ins. Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API