Legal Opinion

Clark v. Williard

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 2, 1934No. 449PublishedCited by 114 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cardozo

The question is whether full faith and credit has been given by the courts of Montana to the statutes and judi cial proceedings of the State of Iowa. United States Constitution, Art. IV, § 1.

The petitioner, the official liquidator of an Iowa insurance company, declares himself the universal successor of the corporation (Keatley v. Furey, 226 U.S. 399, 403, 404), the representative of its personality and powers after its life has been extinguished. Relfe v. Rundle, 103 U.S. 222; Martyne v. American Union Fire Ins. Co., 216 N.Y. 183; 110 N.E. 502; Deschenes v. Tallman, 248 N.Y. 33, 37; 161 N.E.…

2Cases cited92 opinions

  1. Forgay v. ConradSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
  2. Hollins v. Brierfield Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Dorchy v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Cole v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Booth v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1855

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by114 opinions

  1. Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. CohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Morris v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Radio Station Wow, Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Richfield Oil Corp. v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API