Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Rahn
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 11, 2003PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 14, 2003, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.
Claimant worked as a part-time custodian for the employer. Shortly after she returned from her maternity leave, claimant’s work hours were reduced and rescheduled, causing a conflict with the work schedule of her second part-time job for a different employer. This scheduling conflict would require claimant to resign from her second job which, she…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the Claim of BlankenshipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- In re the Claim of OrlikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re the Claim of SampicaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re the Claim of NyackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re DeGennaroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re the Claim of GiovatiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of MallimoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of DentonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.