Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Mallimo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 29, 2004PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1018Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 18, 2003, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.
Claimant, a transcriptionist for a medical office, quit her part-time employment when her at-home hours were reduced. Due to the fluctuation in work, the employer could no longer provide claimant with 10 hours of at-home work as previously anticipated, but claimant could have maintained her hours by working in the office. Under these…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the Claim of BlankenshipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- In re the Claim of RahnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of James R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Claim of Hobson-WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of CherryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of ParkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of SangiorgioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of ErnoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004