Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Sampica

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 9, 1998PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Ap*703peal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 25, 1997, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Upon our review of the record, we find substantial evidence to support the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant voluntarily left his position as a part-time security officer without good cause. The record indicates that claimant was upset with the hours he was scheduled to work and, when his supervisor refused to change the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of KaufmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. In re the Claim of BiotAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. In re the Claim of FernandezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of RahnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. In re the Claim of McCarthyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. In re the Claim of McCarthyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. MatterofMcCarthy[Commr.ofLabor]Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API