Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Giovati

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 5, 2004PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 30, 2002, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruling that claimant left his employment as a salesperson without good cause. Dissatisfaction with one’s work schedule does not constitute good cause for leaving employment (see Matter of Rahn [Commissioner of Labor], 308 AD2d 629 [2003]) nor does dissatisfaction with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of RahnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. In re the Claim of ZalinkaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. In re the Claim of FierroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of DentonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. In re the Claim of EnneddamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. In re the Claim of JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. In re HughesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. In re the Claim of ArbitaljacobyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API