Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Nyack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 17, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 17, 2001, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was employed as a mail carrier for the United States Postal Service until her discharge for repeated lateness, which persisted despite numerous written warnings that continued tardiness could result in her termination. Chronic lateness, following adequate warnings, may disqualify a claimant from receiving benefits (see Matter of Chapman [Commissioner…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of DucatAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. In re the Claim of ChapmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. In re the Claim of ManjarrezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. In re the Claim of HunttAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of RahnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. In re the Claim of RushAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. In re the Claim of MassucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API