Legal Opinion

Barkley v. Banque Belge Pour L'Etranger

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 1928No. Docket No. 6211PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

Pursuant to proceedings had in conformity with the provisions of part 3, title XI, chapter 5, article I, of the Code of Civil Procedure, the superior court in and for the county of San Mateo, on August 2, 1926, made an order setting apart to Thomas J. Barkley, surviving husband of Sannie S. Barkley, deceased, a probate homestead selected from the separate property of the deceased and limited to a period of one year, from which order two appeals have been taken, one by the said Barkley, claiming that the limitation placed upon the duration of the homestead constituted an abuse of discretion,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Rosenblum v. LevyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. In re Estate of MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Phelan v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Weinreich v. HensleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. In Re the Estate of KlumpkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Estate of NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Estate of ClausseniusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. In Re Moore's EstateArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Estate of RonayneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Hale v. Citizens National Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API