Hale v. Citizens National Trust & Savings Bank
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BISHOP, J., pro tem.
We believe that appellant's petition that a homestead be selected and set apart for her use, that the exempt personal property be set aside for her use and that she be granted an allowance for her support should have been acted upon favorably. Appellant is the widow of the decedent whose estate is being administered. An inventory of the estate had been returned, fixing the value of the exempt property as $166.50, and of the property sought as a homestead as $1750. The property which appellant wants awarded to her as a homestead is fit for such a purpose, for it was…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Estate of YoellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Wickersham v. ComerfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- In re estate of LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- In re the Estate of NoahCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Estate of GouldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Estate of WoodwardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Estate of FultonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- In Re Estate of FultonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Ruiz v. CuttingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Stewart v. ForemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.