Legal Opinion

Kunze v. Cox

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1897PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Iosco; Simpson, J. Trover by Emil E. Kunze and John Sullivan, copartners, against Thomas P. Cox, sheriff of Iosco county. From -a judgment for defendant, plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The plaintiffs were copartners in the business of lumbering, and had certain lumber in different piles. It is claimed that the defendant converted two of these piles of lumber, by selling them separately, under different levies, upon an execution for the debt of Kunze, one of the copartners. There is evidence tending to show that the pile first sold was set off to Kunze by direction of Sullivan; but, however that may be, the defendant attempted to show that he sold only the interest of Kunze in that pile, and that the bidders and purchasers at the sale were told by him, and understood, that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sirrine v. BriggsMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Hutchinson v. DuboisMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Haynes v. KnowlesMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Lambert v. GriffithMichigan Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ayers v. GenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Richstein v. RoeschSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Guarantee Bond & Mortgage Co. v. HildingMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Tomkovich v. MistevichMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Line v. McCallMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API