Line v. McCall
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Ontonagon; Haire, J. Bill by Mary Line, Luther M. Packard, and Albert J. Pauli against Alexander McOall and James McBurney to set aside the discharge of a judgment. From a decree dismissing the bill, complainants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
In 1894, and until some time in 1895, Lou J. Le Veque and Henry Alway were copartners; their business, as testified to by Alway, being “making board timber, buying and selling pine lands, looking up lands, estimating timber, taking options, and making waney board timber.” They claim to have made a parol contract with defendants by which it was agreed that they were to get out for the defendants waney pine timber on certain descriptions of land, for which they (the plaintiffs) were then negotiating, and which they claim to have afterwards purchased under the contract with defendants. They also…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bank v. Carrollton RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Griswold v. WaddingtonNew York Supreme Court · 1819
- Burnett v. CrandallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
- Weeks v. Wayne Circuit JudgesMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Beers v. . HendricksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dreiband v. CandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Alexander v. MunroeOregon Supreme Court · 1909
- Escanaba Traction Co. v. BurnsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919