Legal Opinion

Hutchinson v. Dubois

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1881PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Ingham. Replevin. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

In the circuit court, where the positions of the parties were reversed, Dubois had brought replevin for a number of horses, carriages and other property constituting a livery stock in Williamston, and he gave evidence tending to show that he was sole owner of all the property at the time the suit was commenced; that a few days previously the defendant seized it and took it out of his possession and removed it from the barn and premises where it had constituted the stock of a livery for some three years, to another bam some thirty rods away, on another street, and had and exercised exclusive…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sirrine v. BriggsMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  2. In re SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1819
  3. Atkins v. . SaxtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  4. Church v. KnoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1818
  5. Wiles v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Missouri · 1857

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wesson v. GalefDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1922
  2. Eilers Music House v. ReineOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Michigan Trust Co. v. ChapinMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Reed v. GouldMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Kunze v. CoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API